IVPP-IR  > 中科院古脊椎所(2000年以后)
Early Gnathostome Phylogeny Revisited: Multiple Method Consensus
Qiao, Tuo1; King, Benedict2; Long, John A.2; Ahlberg, Per E.3; Zhu, Min1
2016-09-20
发表期刊PLOS ONE
卷号11期号:9
文章类型Article
摘要A series of recent studies recovered consistent phylogenetic scenarios of jawed vertebrates, such as the paraphyly of placoderms with respect to crown gnathostomes, and antiarchs as the sister group of all other jawed vertebrates. However, some of the phylogenetic relationships within the group have remained controversial, such as the positions of Entelognathus, ptyctodontids, and the Guiyu-lineage that comprises Guiyu, Psarolepis and Achoania. The revision of the dataset in a recent study reveals a modified phylogenetic hypothesis, which shows that some of these phylogenetic conflicts were sourced from a few inadvertent miscodings. The interrelationships of early gnathostomes are addressed based on a combined new dataset with 103 taxa and 335 characters, which is the most comprehensive morphological dataset constructed to date. This dataset is investigated in a phylogenetic context using maximum parsimony (MP), Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) approaches in an attempt to explore the consensus and incongruence between the hypotheses of early gnathostome interrelationships recovered from different methods. Our findings consistently corroborate the paraphyly of placoderms, all 'acanthodians' as a paraphyletic stem group of chondrichthyans, Entelognathus as a stem gnathostome, and the Guiyu-lineage as stem sarcopterygians. The incongruence using different methods is less significant than the consensus, and mainly relates to the positions of the placoderm Wuttagoonaspis, the stem chondrichthyan Ramirosuarezia, and the stem osteichthyan Lophosteus D the taxa that are either poorly known or highly specialized in character complement. Given that the different performances of each phylogenetic approach, our study provides an empirical case that the multiple phylogenetic analyses of morphological data are mutually complementary rather than redundant.
WOS标题词Science & Technology
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0163157
关键词[WOS]LOPHOSTEUS-SUPERBUS PANDER ; NEW-SOUTH-WALES ; BAYESIAN-INFERENCE ; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ; WESTERN-AUSTRALIA ; PLACODERM FISHES ; COMMON ANCESTOR ; DEVONIAN PERIOD ; SHEDS LIGHT ; BONY FISHES
收录类别SCI
语种英语
项目资助者MST of China(2012CB821902) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China(41202016 ; National Science Fund for Talent Training in Basic Science(J1210008) ; State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Straigraphy (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, CAS)(133109) ; Australian Research Council(DP14014161) ; 41472016 ; 41530102)
WOS研究方向Science & Technology - Other Topics
WOS类目Multidisciplinary Sciences
WOS记录号WOS:000383892100059
引用统计
被引频次:46[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.205/handle/311034/6969
专题中科院古脊椎所(2000年以后)
作者单位1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Vertebrate Paleontol & Paleoanthropol, Key Lab Vertebrate Evolut & Human Origins, Beijing, Peoples R China
2.Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Biol Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
3.Uppsala Univ, Dept Organismal Biol, Evolutionary Biol Ctr, Uppsala, Sweden
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Qiao, Tuo,King, Benedict,Long, John A.,et al. Early Gnathostome Phylogeny Revisited: Multiple Method Consensus[J]. PLOS ONE,2016,11(9).
APA Qiao, Tuo,King, Benedict,Long, John A.,Ahlberg, Per E.,&Zhu, Min.(2016).Early Gnathostome Phylogeny Revisited: Multiple Method Consensus.PLOS ONE,11(9).
MLA Qiao, Tuo,et al."Early Gnathostome Phylogeny Revisited: Multiple Method Consensus".PLOS ONE 11.9(2016).
条目包含的文件 下载所有文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
pone.0163157.pdf(2770KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取CC BY-NC-SA浏览 下载
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Qiao, Tuo]的文章
[King, Benedict]的文章
[Long, John A.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Qiao, Tuo]的文章
[King, Benedict]的文章
[Long, John A.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Qiao, Tuo]的文章
[King, Benedict]的文章
[Long, John A.]的文章
相关权益政策
中科院和国家自然科学...
收藏/分享
文件名: pone.0163157.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。